##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

Introduction: In some cases, quality of life for dialysis patients leads to the search for home-based environments. In others, the home environment may represent a significant barrier. Analysing the environment in which dialysis treatment takes place is related to the patient’s capacity for self-management of both treatment and disease. Nursing care plans should, from an early stage, assess whether an environment is appropriate and consider the patient’s self-management style, encouraging an active role.
Objective: To explore the lived experience of dialysis patients in relation to personal self-management of treatment and the environment in which it occurs.
Material and Method: We conducted a descriptive phenomenological qualitative study through interviews with patients enrolled in different dialysis programmes. A non-probabilistic sampling method was used. Results were obtained through verbatim transcription, constant comparison, and field notes from the interviews. Discourse was analysed using triangulation and an iterative inductive thematic analysis.
Results: A total of 24 participants were interviewed. The categories and codes identified were: a) Hospital-based: a.a) Dialysis units: limited privacy, ineffective coping, social participation, passive role. b) Home-based: b.a) Home haemodialysis: active role, architectural barriers, family barriers. b.b) Peritoneal dialysis: daily exchanges, nocturnal cycler, space organisation, active role.
Conclusions: The environment in which dialysis treatment is carried out appears to be a key factor for patients and is linked to their capacity to enhance self-management. Nursing practice should involve early interventions aimed at understanding the impact of the environment.

Keywords

renal dialysis haemodialysis home peritoneal dialysis nursing dialysis

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
1.
Escudero López M Ángel, Marcilla Toribio I, Bartolomé Gutiérrez R, Martínez Andrés M. Analysis of Patients’ Experience Regarding Self-Management Capacity in Dialysis Treatment and the Influence of the Environment. Enferm Nefrol [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Ma 5];28(3):[about 8 p.]. Available from: https://enfermerianefrologica.syspre.sysprovider.com/revista/article/view/4908

How to Cite

1.
Escudero López M Ángel, Marcilla Toribio I, Bartolomé Gutiérrez R, Martínez Andrés M. Analysis of Patients’ Experience Regarding Self-Management Capacity in Dialysis Treatment and the Influence of the Environment. Enferm Nefrol [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Ma 5];28(3):[about 8 p.]. Available from: https://enfermerianefrologica.syspre.sysprovider.com/revista/article/view/4908

References

  1. García GG., Iyengar A, Kaze F, Kierans C, Padilla-Altamira C, Luyckx VA. Sex and gender differences in chronic kidney disease and access to care around the globe. Semin Nephrol. 2022:101-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.04.001
  2. Feng X, Hou N, Chen Z, Liu J., Li X, Sun X, et al. Secular trends of epidemiologic patterns of chronic kidney disease over three decades: an updated analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ Open. 2023;13(3):e064540, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064540
  3. Jesky MD, Dutton M, Dasgupta I, Yadav P, Ng KP, Fenton A., et al. Health-related quality of life impacts mortality but not progression to end-stage renal disease in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: A prospective observational study. PLoS One. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165675
  4. Escudero López M, Martínez Andrés M, Marcilla Toribio I, Moratalla Cebrián ML, Pérez Moreno A, Bartolomé Gutiérrez R. Barriers and facilitators in self-care and management of chronic kidney disease in dialysis patients: A systematic review of qualitative studies. J Clin Nurs. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17193
  5. Mesa-Gresa P, Avesani CM, Clyne N, García-Testal A, Kouidi E, Van Craenenbroeck AH, et al. Needs, barriers and facilitators for a healthier lifestyle in haemodialysis patients: The GoodRENal project. J Clin Nurs. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.16910
  6. Fletcher BR, Damery S, Aiyegbusi OL, Anderson N, Calvert M, Cockwell P, et al. Symptom burden and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003954
  7. Elshahat S, Cockwell P, Maxwell AP, Griffin M, O’Brien T, O’Neill C. The impact of chronic kidney disease on developed countries from a health economics perspective: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230512
  8. Walker RC, Tipene-Leach D, Graham A, Palmer SC. Patients’ Experiences of Community House Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study. Kidney Med. 2019;1(6):338-46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2019.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2019.07.010
  9. Hall PA, Fong GT. Temporal self-regulation theory: A model for individual health behavior. Health Psychol Rev. 2007;1(1):6-52, https://:10.1080/17437190701492437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17437190701492437
  10. Hall PA, Fong GT. Temporal self-regulation theory: Integrating biological, psychological, and ecological determinants of health behavior performance. Social Neuroscience and Public Health: Foundations for the Science of Chronic Disease Prevention. Springer New York; 2013. p. 35-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6852-3_3
  11. Hall PA, Fong GT. Temporal Self-Regulation theory: A neurobiologically informed model for physical activity behavior. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9(MAR), https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00117
  12. Giacomini MK, Cook DJ, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature. JAMA. 2000;284(4), https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.4.478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.284.4.478
  13. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-57, https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  14. Hong LI, Wang W, Chan EY, Mohamed F, Chen HC. Dietary and fluid restriction perceptions of patients undergoing haemodialysis: an exploratory study. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(21-22):3664-76, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13739
  15. Lee EJ, Chang AK, Chung YC. Socioecological Factors Affecting Fluid Restriction Adherence Among Korean Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 2021;32(3):239-47, https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620919162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659620919162
  16. Mailani F, Muthia R, Herien Y, Huriani E, Chan CM., Abdullah KL. ORIGINAL RESEARCH The Fluid Management Experience in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study. Nurse Media Journal of Nursing. 2021;11(3):389-403, https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.38838 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v11i3.38838
  17. Stevenson J, Tong A, Gutman T, Campbell KL, Craig JC, Brown MA, et al. Experiences and Perspectives of Dietary Management Among Patients on Hemodialysis: An Interview Study. Journal of Renal Nutrition. 2018;28(6):411-21, https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2018.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2018.02.005
  18. Sciberras A, Scerri J. Facilitators and barriers to treatment with haemodialysis among persons in mid-adulthood: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Scand J Caring Sci. 2017;31(4):695-701, https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12381
  19. Årestedt L, Martinsson C, Hjelm C, Uhlin F, Eldh AC. Context Factors Facilitating and Hindering Patient Participation in Dialysis Care: A Focus Group Study With Patients and Staff. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020;17(6):457-64, https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12452
  20. Alcalde Bezhold G, Alcázar Arroyo R, Angoso de Guzmán M, Arenas MD, Arias Guillén M, Arribas-Cobo P, et al. Guía de unidades de hemodiálisis 2020. Nefrología. 2021;41:1-77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2021.07.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2021.07.011
  21. Kilonzo KG, Ghosh S, Temu SA, Maro V, Callegari J, Carter M, et al. Outcome of acute peritoneal dialysis in Northern Tanzania. Peritoneal Dialysis International. 2012;32(3):261-6, https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2012.00083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2012.00083
  22. Lillebuen L, Schick-Makaroff K, Thompson S, Molzahn A. Facilitators and Barriers to Care in Rural Emergency Departments in Alberta for Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD): An Interpretive Descriptive Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020;7, https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358120970098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2054358120970098
  23. Clark-Cutaia MN, Sevick MA, Thurheimer-Cacciotti J, Hoffman LA, Snetselaar L, Burke LE, et al. Perceived Barriers to Adherence to Hemodialysis Dietary Recommendations. Clin Nurs Res. 2019;28(8):1009-29, https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818773364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773818773364
  24. Phillips Salimi CR, Haase JE, Kooken WC. Connectedness in the context of patient–provider relationships: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(1):230-45, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05763.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05763.x
  25. Ladeiras-Lopes R, Baciu L, Grapsa J, Sohaib A, Vidal Pérez R, Bohm A, et al. Social media in cardiovascular medicine: A contemporary review. European Heart Journal - Digital Health. 2020:10-9, https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaa004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaa004

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.